Before
I get into the bulk of this, let me just say right off the bat this is not
going to be some anti-capitalist pro-99% blog entry. I save that for my posts
on facebook and Youtube (which I should stop because it only gains me unwanted
attention). No, this blog entry is about how in so many movies, films and comic
books they end up with the villains being financed by publicly traded
companies. You would think more stockholders would care that they’ve invested
in companies that are pure evil.
The
first example of a truly evil corporation is one that seems to not even be a
company, but a private army. That company is the Umbrella Corporation of the
Resident Evil franchise. From what I can see from the movies and the games, the
Umbrella Corporation is good at making zombies and other such monsters. And
that is it. They don’t make zombies as some sort of side product to supplement
their income. The Umbrella Corporation made the T-Virus and some how used that
to fuel their evil worldwide empire where they make worse and worse versions of
the T-Virus. If ever there was a strong argument for the EPA, it is the
Umbrella Corporation.
"I swear, this armor is totally a business expense." |
But
a corporation can only be as good or evil as the people in charge of it. Which
is how a company like LexCorp can gain so much power in a free economy and
still be the financial and technological backers for so many diabolical
schemes. I cannot imagine a yearly stockholders meeting of LexCorp where Lex
Luthor gets up and explains how he is using their money to obtain large
quantities of Kryptonite. Steve Jobs certainly never created any doomsday
weapons during his stewardship of Apple (or maybe he did and that’s what gave
him cancer. Possible subject for a future blog entry.)
Avengers' Mansion |
To
be sure there are good corporations in the fictional world. Wayne Entreprises
and Stark Industries both finance super heroes and the endeavors and secret
projects of those heroes. Tony Stark and Bruce Wayne have both funneled stock
holder money into the financing of The Avengers (Quinjets, Avengers Mansion,
Communication ID cards) and The Justice League (Watchtower Satellite and
Moonbase, Hall of Justice). But when you think about it, spending money on
super heroes is just as bad as spending money on a super-villain plot. The only
thing that differentiates them is the outcome of their endeavors. Personally I
feel that were I a stockholder of either Wayne Enterprises or Stark Industries
(and personally I wish I was), I don’t think I’d have a problem being told that
some of my money had been used to fund saving the world.
But
while there are good corporate owners like Tony Stark and Bruce Wayne it seems
like they are the minority. Just looking at the James Bond franchise it seems
like there is a never ending amount of wealthy evil geniuses, many of them who
earned their fortunes legitimately before they started their nefarious plots.
They
say money is the root of all evil. I don’t believe that to be true, but it
certainly seems to be a branch on the evil tree. Money is soaking up sunlight
and nutrients for evil but it is not the main root. Good and evil can be seen
in rich and poor a like. Money can only facilitate the motives of a person and
depending on whether the person is already good or evil will determine the
outcome.
(WRITER'S NOTE: Also lets not forget individuals like Thomas Crowne, who abandoned the stewardship of a billion dollar company in pursuit of cheap thrills. How many people ended up losing their jobs because this billionaire got bored?)
(WRITER'S NOTE: Also lets not forget individuals like Thomas Crowne, who abandoned the stewardship of a billion dollar company in pursuit of cheap thrills. How many people ended up losing their jobs because this billionaire got bored?)