If you study television as long as I have (which is a nice
way of saying you watch hours and hours of TV and make a nice deep indent in
your couch) you can see certain trends every year among the popular new shows. Some
years it will be a nostalgia kick, others it will be an emphasis on sex. This
past year however its been all about violence. And not just violence, but gory
violence.
Three popular shows to come on the air in this recent
television season were The Following, Bates Motel and Hannibal. All three of
these shows revolve around serial killers and grizzly murders. Now there have
been violent shows on TV before. Dexter has enjoyed critical fame by
dispatching criminals regularly. One of my favorite shows, Game of Thrones,
regularly decapitates characters. Violence in TV is nothing new. What makes the
violence in the three listed shows so interesting is that these shows are on
basic cable. Two of them are on networks! Dexter and Game of Thrones both are
on pay cable, which means there really are no rules. They can have as much sex
and violence as they like so there is no surprise there.
If you know anything about network TV, the TV networks are
notorious for not enjoying controversial programming. So much of network
programming is formulaic and safe. Mostly because networks are not broadcast
the same everywhere. Cable networks are broadcast the same throughout the
United States. But the networks broadcast their programming through local
affiliates. Each affiliate represents a different community and can often
receive pressure to reflect the community standards of the market they
broadcast in. Also broadcast networks are still under the watchful eye of the
FCC while cable networks are not.
So why is this violent trend so popular right now? Since
networks are so careful about what they put on their air, why would any channel
want to risk broadcasting programs that are regularly offensive and grotesque.
Part of it could be viewer demand for something outside the mainstream but that
more accounts for the reception of these programs. It does not explain why the
networks wanted to take a risk on these programs to begin with.
Part of the hypocrisy of broadcast TV can be seen with these
shows. Many shows have been taken of the air in certain markets but when you
look at shows like the ones mentioned above, they rarely seem to be banned.
Because they deal with violence. Most of the shows that get taken off the air
usually deal with sex. The same trend can be seen when films are being rated. A
horribly violent film can easily get away with a horribly bloody violence. But
one sex scene with nudity? Automatic R rating. NC-17 if that scene involves
members of the same sex. Despite any other content in the film. It seems a terrible
double standard, but it is practically common practice in our culture. Sex is
more offensive than violence. But why? Why should
sex be more offensive than violence and death? Certainly this can be traced to
puritan attitudes in place since the founding of America. But that only
explains our aversion to sexual contact. It still doesn’t explain why we are so
accepting of violence. Certainly there is no benefit to encouraging the viewing
of violent content, in any medium.
Perhaps the truth is that violence fascinates us, while sex titillates
us. It is easier to control ones adrenaline than it is to control ones arousal,
so we are not as worried about being exposed to violence. We believe that any
feelings of rage or aggression that such imagery inspires in us, we can control
it. However society has taught us it is not socially acceptable to be aroused
in public and we have little to no control of those feelings. In any case, sex
and violence are not going anywhere. As long as they are a part of our culture
they will be a part of our entertainment, the only question being which is more
dominant at the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment