If you ever spend any amount of time listening to a
Christian Conservative speak, not an activity I can ever recommend, at some
point you will here them reference the sinful and godlessness of Hollywood. Tinseltown,
the Land of Dreams, all elicit comparisons from the Right as modern day Sodom.
But while Hollywood may be an easy target for condemnation and ridicule, the
truth is The Religious Right is just as imbedded in the Entertainment industry
as it is in the hallowed halls of government. The proof is right there on the
Silver Screen.
As I sit typing this, the film Son of God is playing at the
Cineplex across the street. If the title confuses you, the movie is about Jesus
Christ. Yes, THAT son of God. Certainly one religious movie can be viewed as a
fluke in Atheist ruled Hollywood, except Darren Aronofsky’s Noah is debuting at
the end of the month. So even though Christians will picket Harry Potter as
promoting witchcraft to our children, they’ll gladly get the grosses up on a
film if it based on the Bible.
And this year is seeing a flood (no pun intended, Noah) of
religious themed films hitting the American Box Office. One such film that I
actually find offensive is the film God’s Not Dead. While there should be
nothing wrong with a film where someone confirms their faith, it seems like
this film only does so by bashing Atheists. The main antagonist of the film
(played by Kevin Sorbo, of Hercules fame) is such a negative portrayal of Atheism he almost
should be twirling a mustache in every scene. And the protagonist’s horrible
arguments for his faith are only believable to the already devout and should
not work on changing the antagonists mind. It’s Christian propaganda
masquerading as a coming of age film that’s been done better in any number of
films that never needed to resort to name calling (Good Will Hunting is a
thousand times better and never once insults the believer or nonbeliever).
But God’s Not Dead is far from the only religious themed
film taking potshots at Atheism. The film I Origins also feels the need to take
a character who is a nonbeliever and at every turn bombard him with fictitious
reasons why he needs to believe. Because as you will learn if you talk to most
religious people about Atheists, all atheists are “miserable and depressed with
no meaning to their lives.” So therefore if a character is an atheist in a
religious film, the only way for him to achieve happiness is to find religion.
The simple truth is that the surge in religious features has
nothing to do with an increase in spirituality; it is simply a moneymaking
tactic. The best example of this are the commercials for the film Heaven is For
Real. Unlike most trailers for other films that are out in theatres, this film
has a number you can call to book group showings. Why? Because church groups
will rent out a theatre and see this film, about a young boy who briefly dies
and is revived claiming to have seen Heaven. This same tactic of religious
groups attending a film is what led The Passion of the Christ to be one of
highest grossing films of all time (I sadly doubt that Heaven is for Real will
reach the same level, but it will certainly make its money back). While I am
sure the filmmakers initial aim was to make a film that was meant to be a touching
emotional spiritual tale, they are not above exploiting the faith of the
audience to sell a product. And as many arguments are made about the importance
of art, art is a product. The selling of that product allows more art to be
produced and so on and so on.
Now while one could argue that Heaven is For Real and God Is
Not Dead are fringe films due to their low budget, one can certainly not make
that argument for Noah. Nor can the argument be made for Exodus which is coming
out later this year or Left Behind which comes out shortly after that, starring
Christian Bale and Nicholas Cage respectively. Both of those films are large
budget films with religious overtones. They are produced within the studio
system that so many conservatives claim to be godless and against religion. So
against religion that there are nearly as many religious movies coming out as
movies based on comic books
But making religious themed films is not a new concept for
Hollywood. Lots of films have been produced over the years that have been based
on religious texts or had a religious overtone (primarily these films are
Christian as they are trying to appeal to an American audience which is also
mostly Christian). The Ten Commandments starring Charlton Heston is still to
this day one of the greatest films ever made, and was at the time one of the
most monumental cinematic undertakings of its time. Studios would not have
invested that much time and effort if they were anti-religion. The Passion of
the Christ is one of the most financially successful films of all time and gave
Mel Gibson the clout to do pretty much whatever project he wanted (and escape
numerous personal scandals). Even religious films that try to lightly mock
religion like Life of Brian, Dogma, or Bruce Almighty do so with only the most
tongue in cheek of mockery and ultimately give more respect to the source
material than the so called extremist Christians who denounce such films.
The simple truth is that Hollywood is completely
pro-religion. The town itself is bursting with churches and centers of all
sorts of different belief systems. Someone once said a new church is built daily
in Los Angeles and driving around it certainly seems to be true. The simple
fact is as long as there are people willing to see a film about religion there
will be people in Hollywood trying to make those films. It is the audience that
dictates the subject that is produced. Demand creates supply, not the other way
around.
I'm not one to talk about the sociological output of Hollywood, but I'm pretty sure that the handful of (mostly admittedly bad and poorly designed) Christian films aren't much of a testament (no pun intended) to the vast flood of morally reprehensible tripe that Tinseltown churns out year after year. A quick look at any given year's worth of Oscar nominees can attest to that. I'd say that Hollywood the film-making institution may not be exactly "anti-religion," but it is undoubtedly anti-Christ, and for that matter, a place where immoral behavior is encouraged and celebrated. Once again, I can't speak for the people of Hollywood, the ones building all those churches. Nor can I speak for the high-ranking executives, actors, writers, and directors who have a hand in this matter. But judging by the typical output of this peculiar institution, I'd be hard pressed to find Hollywood as anything remotely resembling pro-Christ.
ReplyDeleteAll in all, I do agree with the analysis that the splurge of Christian films is little more than a marketing tactic, but I do hope that it may lead to a resurgence in films that aren't morally bankrupt.